Live
Black Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessHow 1 Missing Line of Code Cost Anthropic $340 BillionDev.to AII Built npm for AI Skills — Here's Why AI Needs a Package ManagerDev.to AIAn I/O psychologist's rules for stopping AI agents from cutting cornersHacker News AI TopAisthOS: What if your OS compiled UP instead of down?Dev.to AII Moved a Folder. Claude Code Told Me Not to Copy My Own Secrets.Dev.to AIЯ собрал AI бота за вечер - он уже продаётDev.to AIMeshLedger – AI agents hire and pay each other through on-chain escrowHacker News AI TopAgents Can Pay. That's Not the Problem.Dev.to AIBizNode's self-healing watchdog auto-restarts crashed services. Zero downtime, zero babysitting neededDev.to AIPrologue: After We No Longer Write Code by Hand, What Remains for Engineers?Dev.to AIAI Knows Your Project Budget Will Fail Before You DoDev.to AILong Term AI Memory by creator of Apache CassandraDev.to AIBlack Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessHow 1 Missing Line of Code Cost Anthropic $340 BillionDev.to AII Built npm for AI Skills — Here's Why AI Needs a Package ManagerDev.to AIAn I/O psychologist's rules for stopping AI agents from cutting cornersHacker News AI TopAisthOS: What if your OS compiled UP instead of down?Dev.to AII Moved a Folder. Claude Code Told Me Not to Copy My Own Secrets.Dev.to AIЯ собрал AI бота за вечер - он уже продаётDev.to AIMeshLedger – AI agents hire and pay each other through on-chain escrowHacker News AI TopAgents Can Pay. That's Not the Problem.Dev.to AIBizNode's self-healing watchdog auto-restarts crashed services. Zero downtime, zero babysitting neededDev.to AIPrologue: After We No Longer Write Code by Hand, What Remains for Engineers?Dev.to AIAI Knows Your Project Budget Will Fail Before You DoDev.to AILong Term AI Memory by creator of Apache CassandraDev.to AI
AI NEWS HUBbyEIGENVECTOREigenvector

Selection, Reflection and Self-Refinement: Revisit Reasoning Tasks via a Causal Lens

arXivMarch 30, 202610 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2510.08222v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Due to their inherent complexity, reasoning tasks have long been regarded as rigorous benchmarks for assessing the capabilities of machine learning models, especially large language models (LLMs). Although humans can solve these tasks with ease, existing models, even after extensive pre-training and post-training at scale, still fail to perform reasoning reliably. In this paper, we revisit reasoning tasks from a causal perspective, seeking to understand their behavior in latent space and to offer insights for addressing their challenges. Spec — Yunlong Deng, Boyang Sun, Yan Li, Lingjing Kong, Zeyu Tang, Kun Zhang, Guangyi Chen

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Due to their inherent complexity, reasoning tasks have long been regarded as rigorous benchmarks for assessing the capabilities of machine learning models, especially large language models (LLMs). Although humans can solve these tasks with ease, existing models, even after extensive pre-training and post-training at scale, still fail to perform reasoning reliably. In this paper, we revisit reasoning tasks from a causal perspective, seeking to understand their behavior in latent space and to offer insights for addressing their challenges. Specifically, we cast reasoning tasks as a selection mechanism, in which high-level logical concepts function as selection operators on the given observations, such as, identifying the correct answer in a math problem or filling the appropriate entry in Sudoku. We emphasize two key properties of this formulation that shed light on the difficulty of reasoning tasks. First, the latent space exceeds the observation space in complexity, even when the correct answer is fully determined by the observed input. Second, the latent variables, corresponding to logical thought, are densely structured and exhibit strong dependencies. Building on this formulation, we introduce a framework, called SR$^2$, that incorporates the estimated latent variables as feedback into the selection mechanism, thereby facilitating the learning of dense dependencies among latent representations. The framework consists of three key modules: reflective representation learning, dependency self-refinement, and periodic intermediate alignment. Experimentally, we show that our approach yields significant gains in reasoning accuracy, for example, attaining over 10$%$ improvement in performance with 8$\times$ fewer parameters on the Sudoku and Maze tasks over the recent advances.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2510.08222 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2510.08222v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.08222

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yunlong Deng [view email] [v1] Thu, 9 Oct 2025 13:45:31 UTC (1,020 KB) [v2] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 05:07:02 UTC (1,438 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by Eigenvector · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Selection, …researchpaperarxivaiartificial-…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 162 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers