Your Models Have Thought Enough: Training Large Reasoning Models to Stop Overthinking
arXiv:2509.23392v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved impressive performance on challenging tasks, yet their deep reasoning often incurs substantial computational costs. To achieve efficient reasoning, existing reinforcement learning methods still struggle to construct short reasoning path during the rollout stage, limiting effective learning. Inspired by Evidence Accumulation Models, we find that LRMs have accumulated sufficient information early in reasoning, making further reasoning steps redundant. Based on this insight, we propose Just-Enough Thin — Jinyi Han, Ying Huang, Ying Liao, Zishang Jiang, Xikun Lu, Haiquan Zhao, Xinyi Wang, Guanghao Zhou, Sihang Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Weikang Zhou, Zeye Sun, Fei Yu, Yanghua Xiao
Authors:Jinyi Han, Ying Huang, Ying Liao, Zishang Jiang, Xikun Lu, Haiquan Zhao, Xinyi Wang, Guanghao Zhou, Sihang Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Weikang Zhou, Zeye Sun, Fei Yu, Yanghua Xiao
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved impressive performance on challenging tasks, yet their deep reasoning often incurs substantial computational costs. To achieve efficient reasoning, existing reinforcement learning methods still struggle to construct short reasoning path during the rollout stage, limiting effective learning. Inspired by Evidence Accumulation Models, we find that LRMs have accumulated sufficient information early in reasoning, making further reasoning steps redundant. Based on this insight, we propose Just-Enough Thinking (JET), which trains models to proactively terminate unnecessary reasoning. JET performs trajectory truncation during rollout to expose the model to short, distributionally consistent reasoning paths. Besides, it uses a quality-controlled length reward to better encourage concise reasoning while maintaining correctness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that JET significantly improves reasoning efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. Especially, DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-1.5B achieves a 4.6% accuracy gain while reducing output length by 46.3% on the Olympiad benchmark. Our code is available in the GitHub.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2509.23392 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2509.23392v3 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.23392
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Jinyi Han [view email] [v1] Sat, 27 Sep 2025 16:25:06 UTC (579 KB) [v2] Sun, 5 Oct 2025 13:54:32 UTC (579 KB) [v3] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:21:37 UTC (780 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv![[D] ICML 2026 Average Score](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-graph-nodes-a2pnJLpyKmDnxKWLd5BEAb.webp)
[D] ICML 2026 Average Score
Hi all, I’m curious about the current review dynamics for ICML 2026, especially after the rebuttal phase. For those who are reviewers (or have insight into the process), could you share what the average scores look like in your batch after rebuttal? Also, do tools like trackers https://papercopilot.com/statistics/icml-statistics/icml-2026-statistics/ reflect true Score distributions to some degree. Appreciate any insights. submitted by /u/Hope999991 [link] [comments]
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.



![[D] CVPR 2026 Travel Grant/Registration Waiver](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-circuit-gold-PMJWD5qsqGfXwX8w9a97Cb.webp)



Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!