PepThink-R1: LLM for Interpretable Cyclic Peptide Optimization with CoT SFT and Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2508.14765v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Designing therapeutic peptides with tailored properties is hindered by the vastness of sequence space, limited experimental data, and poor interpretability of current generative models. To address these challenges, we introduce PepThink-R1, a generative framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) with chain-of-thought (CoT) supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning (RL). Unlike prior approaches, PepThink-R1 explicitly reasons about monomer-level modifications during sequence generation, enabling interpretable design c — Ruheng Wang, Hang Zhang, Trieu Nguyen, Shasha Feng, Hao-Wei Pang, Xiang Yu, Li Xiao, Peter Zhiping Zhang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Designing therapeutic peptides with tailored properties is hindered by the vastness of sequence space, limited experimental data, and poor interpretability of current generative models. To address these challenges, we introduce PepThink-R1, a generative framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) with chain-of-thought (CoT) supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning (RL). Unlike prior approaches, PepThink-R1 explicitly reasons about monomer-level modifications during sequence generation, enabling interpretable design choices while optimizing for multiple pharmacological properties. Guided by a tailored reward function balancing chemical validity and property improvements, the model autonomously explores diverse sequence variants. We demonstrate that PepThink-R1 generates cyclic peptides with significantly enhanced lipophilicity, stability, and exposure, outperforming existing general LLMs (e.g., GPT-5) and domain-specific baseline in both optimization success and interpretability. To our knowledge, this is the first LLM-based peptide design framework that combines explicit reasoning with RL-driven property control, marking a step toward reliable and transparent peptide optimization for therapeutic discovery.
Comments: 39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025) Workshop: AI for Science (Spotlight)
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2508.14765 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2508.14765v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.14765
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Peter Zhang [view email] [v1] Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:13:52 UTC (1,177 KB) [v2] Thu, 20 Nov 2025 06:42:02 UTC (1,181 KB) [v3] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 04:15:44 UTC (1,181 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[D] Does seeing the identify of authors influence your scoring?](https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1504711434969-e33886168f5c?w=600&q=80)
[D] Does seeing the identify of authors influence your scoring?
Let's be honest, at some stage of the review process. A lot of us have gotten bored and tried to Google the papers we are reviewing. And sometimes those papers might have already been uploaded onto arXiv with the identity of the authors. Which we then tried to look them up. As a first-time reviewer, I noticed the top 2 papers in my batch happened to be the only papers in my batch that is on arXiv. I am trying to work out if revealing the author's identity had influenced my decision. Or it's just a coincidence. submitted by /u/d_edge_sword [link] [comments]
Leveraging Commit Size Context and Hyper Co-Change Graph Centralities for Defect Prediction
arXiv:2604.01132v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: File-level defect prediction models traditionally rely on product and process metrics. While process metrics effectively complement product metrics, they often overlook commit size the number of files changed per commit despite its strong association with software quality. Network centrality measures on dependency graphs have also proven to be valuable product level indicators. Motivated by this, we first redefine process metrics as commit size aware process metric vectors, transforming conventional scalar measures into 100 dimensional profiles that capture the distribution of changes across commit size strata. We then model change history as a hyper co change graph, where hyperedges naturally encode commit-size semantics. Vector centralities
Detecting Call Graph Unsoundness without Ground Truth
arXiv:2604.00885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Java static analysis frameworks are commonly compared under the assumption that analysis algorithms and configurations compose monotonically and yield semantically comparable results across tools. In this work, we show that this assumption is fundamentally flawed. We present a large-scale empirical study of semantic consistency within and across four widely used Java static analysis frameworks: Soot, SootUp, WALA, and Doop. Using precision partial orders over analysis algorithms and configurations, we systematically identify violations where increased precision introduces new call-graph edges or amplifies inconsistencies. Our results reveal three key findings. First, algorithmic precision orders frequently break within frameworks due to moder
Containing the Reproducibility Gap: Automated Repository-Level Containerization for Scholarly Jupyter Notebooks
arXiv:2604.01072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computational reproducibility is fundamental to trustworthy science, yet remains difficult to achieve in practice across various research workflows, including Jupyter notebooks published alongside scholarly articles. Environment drift, undocumented dependencies and implicit execution assumptions frequently prevent independent re-execution of published research. Despite existing reproducibility guidelines, scalable and systematic infrastructure for automated assessment remains limited. We present an automated, web-oriented reproducibility engineering pipeline that reconstructs and evaluates repository-level execution environments for scholarly notebooks. The system performs dependency inference, automated container generation, and isolated exe
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!