Designing User-Centric Metrics for Evaluation of Counterfactual Explanations
arXiv:2507.15162v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Counterfactual Explanations (CFEs) have grown in popularity as a means of offering actionable guidance by identifying the minimum changes in feature values required to flip an ML model's prediction to something more desirable. Unfortunately, most prior research on CFEs relies on artificial evaluation metrics, such as proximity, which may overlook end-user preferences and constraints, e.g., the user's perception of effort needed to make certain feature changes may differ from that of the model designer. To address this research gap, this paper — Firdaus Ahmed Choudhury, Ethan Leicht, Jude Ethan Bislig, Hangzhi Guo, Amulya Yadav
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Counterfactual Explanations (CFEs) have grown in popularity as a means of offering actionable guidance by identifying the minimum changes in feature values required to flip an ML model's prediction to something more desirable. Unfortunately, most prior research on CFEs relies on artificial evaluation metrics, such as proximity, which may overlook end-user preferences and constraints, e.g., the user's perception of effort needed to make certain feature changes may differ from that of the model designer. To address this research gap, this paper makes three novel contributions. First, we conduct a pilot study with 20 crowd-workers on Amazon MTurk to experimentally validate the alignment of existing CF evaluation metrics with real-world user preferences. Results show that user-preferred CFEs matched those based on proximity in only 63.81% of cases, highlighting the limited applicability of these metrics in real-world settings. Second, inspired by the need to design a user-informed evaluation metric for CFEs, we conduct a more detailed two-day user study with 41 participants facing realistic credit application scenarios to find experimental support for or against three intuitive hypotheses that may explain how end users evaluate CFEs. Third, based on the findings of this second study, we propose the AWP model, a novel user-centric, two-stage model that describes one possible mechanism by which users evaluate and select CFEs. Our results show that AWP predicts user-preferred CFEs with 84.37% accuracy. Our study provides the first human-centered validation for personalized cost models in CFE generation and highlights the need for adaptive, user-centered evaluation metrics.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2507.15162 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2507.15162v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.15162
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Firdaus Ahmed Choudhury [view email] [v1] Sun, 20 Jul 2025 23:58:29 UTC (2,678 KB) [v2] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 01:31:53 UTC (474 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Research across 1,372 participants and 9K+ trials details "cognitive surrender", where most subjects had minimal AI skepticism and accepted faulty AI reasoning (Kyle Orland/Ars Technica)
Kyle Orland / Ars Technica : Research across 1,372 participants and 9K+ trials details cognitive surrender , where most subjects had minimal AI skepticism and accepted faulty AI reasoning When it comes to large language model-powered tools, there are generally two broad categories of users.

Apple reportedly signed a 3rd-party driver, by Tiny Corp, for AMD or Nvidia eGPUs for Apple Silicon Macs; it s meant for AI research, not accelerating graphics (AppleInsider)
AppleInsider : Apple reportedly signed a 3rd-party driver, by Tiny Corp, for AMD or Nvidia eGPUs for Apple Silicon Macs; it's meant for AI research, not accelerating graphics Apple has signed a driver for AMD or Nvidia eGPUs connected to Apple Silicon but there are some big caveats, and it won't improve your graphics.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[D] KDD Review Discussion](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-wave-pattern-4YWNKzoeu65vYpqRKWMiWf.webp)
[D] KDD Review Discussion
KDD 2026 (Feb Cycle) reviews will release today (4-April AoE), This thread is open to discuss about reviews and importantly celebrate successful reviews. Let us all remember that review system is noisy and we all suffer from it and this doesn't define our research impact. Let's all prioritise reviews which enhance our papers. Feel free to discuss your experiences submitted by /u/BomsDrag [link] [comments]

The CEO Building the Most Powerful AI on Earth Just Admitted It Will Destroy Half Your Industry.
January 26, 2026. Dario Amodei published a 20,000-word essay warning that AI will displace 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs in 1–5… Continue reading on Towards AI »

New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article



Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!