ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has enabled tool-augmented agents capable of solving complex real-world tasks through step-by-step reasoning. However, existing evaluations often focus on general-purpose or multimodal scenarios, leaving a gap in domain-specific benchmarks that assess tool-use capabilities in complex remote sensing use cases. We present ThinkGeo, an agentic benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-driven agents on remote sensing tasks via structured tool use and multi-step planning. Inspired by tool-interaction paradigms, ThinkGeo includes human-curated queries spanning a wide range of real-world applications such as urban planning, disaster assessment and change analysis, environmental monitoring, transportation analysis, aviation monitoring, recreational infrastructure, and industrial site analysis. Queries are grounded in satellite or aerial imagery, including both optical RGB and SAR data, and require agents to reason through a diverse toolset. We implement a ReAct-style interaction loop and evaluate both open and closed-source LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o, Qwen2.5) on 486 structured agentic tasks with 1,778 expert-verified reasoning steps. The benchmark reports both step-wise execution metrics and final answer correctness. Our analysis reveals notable disparities in tool accuracy and planning consistency across models. ThinkGeo provides the first extensive testbed for evaluating how tool-enabled LLMs handle spatial reasoning in remote sensing.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2505.23752 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2505.23752v3 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.23752

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Akashah Shabbir [view email] [v1] Thu, 29 May 2025 17:59:38 UTC (5,006 KB) [v2] Thu, 9 Oct 2025 17:29:59 UTC (8,724 KB) [v3] Thu, 2 Apr 2026 04:47:22 UTC (6,298 KB)