Just as Humans Need Vaccines, So Do Models: Model Immunization to Combat Falsehoods
arXiv:2505.17870v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) reproduce misinformation not by memorizing false facts alone, but by learning the linguistic patterns that make falsehoods persuasive, such as hedging, false presuppositions, and fabricated citations. We propose model immunization, a training paradigm based on supervised fine-tuning over curated (false claim, correction) pairs, injected as small vaccine doses (5 to 10% of tokens) alongside truthful data. Unlike post-hoc filtering or preference-based alignment, immunization introduces direct negative supervision on — Shaina Raza, Rizwan Qureshi, Azib Farooq, Marcelo Lotif, Aman Chadha, Deval Pandya, Christos Emmanouilidis
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) reproduce misinformation not by memorizing false facts alone, but by learning the linguistic patterns that make falsehoods persuasive, such as hedging, false presuppositions, and fabricated citations. We propose model immunization, a training paradigm based on supervised fine-tuning over curated (false claim, correction) pairs, injected as small vaccine doses (5 to 10% of tokens) alongside truthful data. Unlike post-hoc filtering or preference-based alignment, immunization introduces direct negative supervision on labeled falsehoods. Across four open weight model families, this approach improves TruthfulQA accuracy by 12 points and increases misinformation rejection rates by 30 points, while preserving overall model capability. We further outline key design requirements, including dosage, labeling, quarantine, and diversity and advocate for standardized vaccine corpora and benchmarks to evaluate generalization. These findings position immunization as a practical and scalable component of responsible LLM development. Project page: this https URL
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2505.17870 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2505.17870v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.17870
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Shaina Raza Dr. [view email] [v1] Fri, 23 May 2025 13:20:23 UTC (4,758 KB) [v2] Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:58:38 UTC (5,719 KB) [v3] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 22:25:36 UTC (5,794 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Source: Anthropic has acquired Coefficient Bio, which was developing a platform that enables AI to run biotech tasks such as planning drug research, for ~$400M (The Information)
The Information : Source: Anthropic has acquired Coefficient Bio, which was developing a platform that enables AI to run biotech tasks such as planning drug research, for ~$400M Anthropic has acquired AI biotech startup Coefficient Bio for roughly $400 million, according to a person with knowledge of the deal.

Source Known Identifiers: A Three-Tier Identity System for Distributed Applications
arXiv:2604.00151v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Distributed applications need identifiers that satisfy storage efficiency, chronological sortability, origin metadata embedding, zero-lookup verifiability, confidentiality for external consumers, and multi-century addressability. Based on our literature survey, no existing scheme provides all six of these identifier properties within a unified system. This paper introduces Source Known Identifiers (SKIDs), a three-tier identity system that projects a single entity identity across trust boundaries, addressing all six properties. The first tier, Source Known ID (SKID), is a 64-bit signed integer embedding a timestamp with a 250-millisecond precision, application topology, and a per-entity-type sequence counter. It serves as the database prima
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

LLMs as Idiomatic Decompilers: Recovering High-Level Code from x86-64 Assembly for Dart
arXiv:2604.02278v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Translating machine code into human-readable high-level languages is an open research problem in reverse engineering. Despite recent advancements in LLM-based decompilation to C, modern languages like Dart and Swift are unexplored. In this paper, we study the use of small specialized LLMs as an idiomatic decompiler for such languages. Additionally, we investigate the augmentation of training data using synthetic same-language examples, and compare it against adding human-written examples using related-language (Swift -> Dart). We apply CODEBLEU to evaluate the decompiled code readability and compile@k to measure the syntax correctness. Our experimental results show that on a 73-function Dart test dataset (representing diverse complexity level

Fuzzing REST APIs in Industry: Necessary Features and Open Problems
arXiv:2604.01759v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: REST APIs are widely used in industry, in all different kinds of domains. An example is Volkswagen AG, a German automobile manufacturer. Established testing approaches for REST APIs are time consuming, and require expertise from professional test engineers. Due to its cost and importance, in the scientific literature several approaches have been proposed to automatically test REST APIs. The open-source, search-based fuzzer EvoMaster is one of such tools proposed in the academic literature. However, how academic prototypes can be integrated in industry and have real impact to software engineering practice requires more investigation. In this paper, we report on our experience in using EvoMaster at Volkswagen AG, as an EvoMaster user from 2023

Triosecuris: Formally Verified Protection Against Speculative Control-Flow Hijacking
arXiv:2601.22978v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper introduces Triosecuris, a formally verified defense against Spectre BTB, RSB, and PHT that combines CET-style hardware-assisted control-flow integrity with compiler-inserted speculative load hardening (SLH). Triosecuris is based on the novel observation that in the presence of CET-style protection, we can precisely detect BTB misspeculation for indirect calls and RSB misspeculation for returns and set the SLH misspeculation flag. We formalize Triosecuris as a transformation in Rocq and provide a machine-checked proof that it achieves relative security: any transformed program running with speculation leaks no more than what the source program leaks without speculation. This strong security guarantee applies to arbitrary p


Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!