SASNet: Spatially-Adaptive Sinusoidal Networks for INRs
arXiv:2503.09750v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sinusoidal neural networks (SIRENs) are powerful implicit neural representations (INRs) for low-dimensional signals in vision and graphics. By encoding input coordinates with sinusoidal functions, they enable high-frequency image and surface reconstruction. However, training SIRENs is often unstable and highly sensitive to frequency initialization: small frequencies produce overly smooth reconstructions in detailed regions, whereas large ones introduce spurious high-frequency components that manifest as noise in smooth areas such as image bac — Haoan Feng, Diana Aldana, Tiago Novello, Leila De Floriani
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Sinusoidal neural networks (SIRENs) are powerful implicit neural representations (INRs) for low-dimensional signals in vision and graphics. By encoding input coordinates with sinusoidal functions, they enable high-frequency image and surface reconstruction. However, training SIRENs is often unstable and highly sensitive to frequency initialization: small frequencies produce overly smooth reconstructions in detailed regions, whereas large ones introduce spurious high-frequency components that manifest as noise in smooth areas such as image backgrounds. To address these challenges, we propose SASNet, a Spatially-Adaptive Sinusoidal Network that couples a frozen frequency embedding layer, which explicitly fixes the network's frequency support, with jointly learned spatial masks that localize neuron influence across the domain. This pairing stabilizes optimization, sharpens edges, and suppresses noise in smooth areas. Experiments on 2D image and 3D volumetric data fitting as well as signed distance field (SDF) reconstruction benchmarks demonstrate that SASNet achieves faster convergence, superior reconstruction quality, and robust frequency localization -- assigning low- and high-frequency neurons to smooth and detailed regions respectively -- while maintaining parameter efficiency. Code available here: this https URL.
Comments: CVPR2026, 10 pages, 10 figures, suppl included
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2503.09750 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2503.09750v4 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.09750
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Haoan Feng [view email] [v1] Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:49:14 UTC (36,238 KB) [v2] Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:41:13 UTC (23,234 KB) [v3] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:09:02 UTC (21,822 KB) [v4] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 22:31:38 UTC (21,823 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
How AI Fails: An Interactive Pedagogical Tool for Demonstrating Dialectal Bias in Automated Toxicity Models
arXiv:2511.06676v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Now that AI-driven moderation has become pervasive in everyday life, we often hear claims that "the AI is biased". While this is often said jokingly, the light-hearted remark reflects a deeper concern. How can we be certain that an online post flagged as "inappropriate" was not simply the victim of a biased algorithm? This paper investigates this problem using a dual approach. First, I conduct a quantitative benchmark of a widely used toxicity model (unitary/toxic-bert) to measure performance disparity between text in African-American English (AAE) and Standard American English (SAE). The benchmark reveals a clear, systematic bias: on average, the model scores AAE text as 1.8 times more toxic and 8.8 times higher for "identity hate"
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!