Beyond In-Distribution Success: Scaling Curves of CoT Granularity for Language Model Generalization
arXiv:2502.18273v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generalization to novel compound tasks under distribution shift is important for deploying transformer-based language models (LMs). This work investigates Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning as a means to enhance OOD generalization. Through controlled experiments across several compound tasks, we reveal three key insights: (1) While QA-trained models achieve near-perfect in-distribution accuracy, their OOD performance degrades catastrophically, even with 10000k+ training examples; (2) the granularity of CoT data strongly correlates with generali — Ru Wang, Wei Huang, Selena Song, Haoyu Zhang, Qian Niu, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Jiaxian Guo
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Generalization to novel compound tasks under distribution shift is important for deploying transformer-based language models (LMs). This work investigates Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning as a means to enhance OOD generalization. Through controlled experiments across several compound tasks, we reveal three key insights: (1) While QA-trained models achieve near-perfect in-distribution accuracy, their OOD performance degrades catastrophically, even with 10000k+ training examples; (2) the granularity of CoT data strongly correlates with generalization performance; finer-grained CoT data leads to better generalization; (3) CoT exhibits remarkable sample efficiency, matching QA performance with much less (even 80%) data. Theoretically, we demonstrate that compound tasks inherently permit shortcuts in Q-A data that misalign with true reasoning principles, while CoT forces internalization of valid dependency structures, and thus can achieve better generalization. Further, we show that transformer positional embeddings can amplify generalization by emphasizing subtask condition recurrence in long CoT sequences. Our combined theoretical and empirical analysis provides compelling evidence for CoT reasoning as a crucial training paradigm for enabling LM generalization under real-world distributional shifts for compound tasks.
Comments: Accepted at the Conference on Parsimony and Learning (CPAL) 2026
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2502.18273 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2502.18273v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.18273
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Ru Wang [view email] [v1] Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:04:17 UTC (590 KB) [v2] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 11:34:11 UTC (193 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems
huggingface.co RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems RFT Fixed Parameter Cosmology Model, Open Validation 1. Fixed‑Parameter Cosmology Panel (FPCM‑OV) This side of the Space shows the core RFT cosmology running on one locked parameter set. Nothing adjusts itself — the whole model stands or falls on this single solution. What people can see here Age at z = 13.67: RFT gives 568.52 Myr , which lines up with JWST early‑galaxy maturity without any tuning. Horizon Ratio: The model naturally produces a horizon about 490× larger than ΛCDM. (This removes the horizon problem without inflation.) Unified Expansion Curve (H_RFT) The purple curve shows how expansion behaves across all redshifts using the same fixed parameters. JWST Maturity Plot The cyan and red lines show how RFT’s predicted
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems
huggingface.co RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems RFT Fixed Parameter Cosmology Model, Open Validation 1. Fixed‑Parameter Cosmology Panel (FPCM‑OV) This side of the Space shows the core RFT cosmology running on one locked parameter set. Nothing adjusts itself — the whole model stands or falls on this single solution. What people can see here Age at z = 13.67: RFT gives 568.52 Myr , which lines up with JWST early‑galaxy maturity without any tuning. Horizon Ratio: The model naturally produces a horizon about 490× larger than ΛCDM. (This removes the horizon problem without inflation.) Unified Expansion Curve (H_RFT) The purple curve shows how expansion behaves across all redshifts using the same fixed parameters. JWST Maturity Plot The cyan and red lines show how RFT’s predicted




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!