QPT V2: Masked Image Modeling Advances Visual Scoring
arXiv:2407.16541v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quality assessment and aesthetics assessment aim to evaluate the perceived quality and aesthetics of visual content. Current learning-based methods suffer greatly from the scarcity of labeled data and usually perform sub-optimally in terms of generalization. Although masked image modeling (MIM) has achieved noteworthy advancements across various high-level tasks (e.g., classification, detection etc.). In this work, we take on a novel perspective to investigate its capabilities in terms of quality- and aesthetics-awareness. To this end, we pro — Qizhi Xie, Kun Yuan, Yunpeng Qu, Mingda Wu, Ming Sun, Chao Zhou, Jihong Zhu
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Quality assessment and aesthetics assessment aim to evaluate the perceived quality and aesthetics of visual content. Current learning-based methods suffer greatly from the scarcity of labeled data and usually perform sub-optimally in terms of generalization. Although masked image modeling (MIM) has achieved noteworthy advancements across various high-level tasks (e.g., classification, detection etc.). In this work, we take on a novel perspective to investigate its capabilities in terms of quality- and aesthetics-awareness. To this end, we propose Quality- and aesthetics-aware pretraining (QPT V2), the first pretraining framework based on MIM that offers a unified solution to quality and aesthetics assessment. To perceive the high-level semantics and fine-grained details, pretraining data is curated. To comprehensively encompass quality- and aesthetics-related factors, degradation is introduced. To capture multi-scale quality and aesthetic information, model structure is modified. Extensive experimental results on 11 downstream benchmarks clearly show the superior performance of QPT V2 in comparison with current state-of-the-art approaches and other pretraining paradigms.
Comments: 8 pages, 6 figures. Accepted by ACM MM 24
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Multimedia (cs.MM)
Cite as: arXiv:2407.16541 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2407.16541v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.16541
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Qizhi Xie [view email] [v1] Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:53:47 UTC (6,312 KB) [v2] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 03:13:37 UTC (4,581 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems
huggingface.co RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems RFT Fixed Parameter Cosmology Model, Open Validation 1. Fixed‑Parameter Cosmology Panel (FPCM‑OV) This side of the Space shows the core RFT cosmology running on one locked parameter set. Nothing adjusts itself — the whole model stands or falls on this single solution. What people can see here Age at z = 13.67: RFT gives 568.52 Myr , which lines up with JWST early‑galaxy maturity without any tuning. Horizon Ratio: The model naturally produces a horizon about 490× larger than ΛCDM. (This removes the horizon problem without inflation.) Unified Expansion Curve (H_RFT) The purple curve shows how expansion behaves across all redshifts using the same fixed parameters. JWST Maturity Plot The cyan and red lines show how RFT’s predicted
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems
huggingface.co RFT FPCM OV - a Hugging Face Space by RFTSystems RFT Fixed Parameter Cosmology Model, Open Validation 1. Fixed‑Parameter Cosmology Panel (FPCM‑OV) This side of the Space shows the core RFT cosmology running on one locked parameter set. Nothing adjusts itself — the whole model stands or falls on this single solution. What people can see here Age at z = 13.67: RFT gives 568.52 Myr , which lines up with JWST early‑galaxy maturity without any tuning. Horizon Ratio: The model naturally produces a horizon about 490× larger than ΛCDM. (This removes the horizon problem without inflation.) Unified Expansion Curve (H_RFT) The purple curve shows how expansion behaves across all redshifts using the same fixed parameters. JWST Maturity Plot The cyan and red lines show how RFT’s predicted



Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!