FinTruthQA: A Benchmark for AI-Driven Financial Disclosure Quality Assessment in Investor -- Firm Interactions
arXiv:2406.12009v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Accurate and transparent financial information disclosure is essential for market efficiency, investor decision-making, and corporate governance. Chinese stock exchanges' investor interactive platforms provide a widely used channel through which listed firms respond to investor concerns, yet these responses are often limited or non-substantive, making disclosure quality difficult to assess at scale. To address this challenge, we introduce FinTruthQA, to our knowledge the first benchmark for AI-driven assessment of financial disclosure quality — Peilin Zhou, Ziyue Xu, Xinyu Shi, Jiageng Wu, Yikang Jiang, Dading Chong, Bin Ke, Jie Yang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Accurate and transparent financial information disclosure is essential for market efficiency, investor decision-making, and corporate governance. Chinese stock exchanges' investor interactive platforms provide a widely used channel through which listed firms respond to investor concerns, yet these responses are often limited or non-substantive, making disclosure quality difficult to assess at scale. To address this challenge, we introduce FinTruthQA, to our knowledge the first benchmark for AI-driven assessment of financial disclosure quality in investor-firm interactions. FinTruthQA comprises 6,000 real-world financial Q&A entries, each manually annotated based on four key evaluation criteria: question identification, question relevance, answer readability, and answer relevance. We benchmark statistical machine learning models, pre-trained language models and their fine-tuned variants, as well as large language models (LLMs), on FinTruthQA. Experiments show that existing models achieve strong performance on question identification and question relevance (F1 > 95%), but remain substantially weaker on answer readability (Micro F1 approximately 88%) and especially answer relevance (Micro F1 approximately 80%), highlighting the nontrivial difficulty of fine-grained disclosure quality assessment. Domain- and task-adapted pre-trained language models consistently outperform general-purpose models and LLM-based prompting on the most challenging settings. These findings position FinTruthQA as a practical foundation for AI-driven disclosure monitoring in capital markets, with value for regulatory oversight, investor protection, and disclosure governance in real-world financial settings.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2406.12009 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2406.12009v4 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.12009
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Ziyue Xu [view email] [v1] Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:25:02 UTC (1,216 KB) [v2] Sat, 7 Dec 2024 15:47:26 UTC (1,273 KB) [v3] Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:49:17 UTC (1,042 KB) [v4] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:49:53 UTC (778 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxivExclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - wsj.com
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">wsj.com</font>
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuANBVV95cUxNNWh0OTV4cnNDLVdHdHVUdE02cWRiaE03VENfdWJFbFlyaXZmbWtJNm9OdU05TXVsRjd4dVFwUzl0WkRfLVJoVzlaNkhKRVl4S0Y0Um5jN2QzZzhsb0twMElFOEpSZjdjX1pZZzNacXIxU2U4Ulloam5nR1hQeXg3TWhoMEE1ZzFzQmdiSjktRG1rUEs2YVVhZ0VMMk0wS3J6SWNJdTdJZlAtTEE0SUdaaFl5QWFUWS05NGFDN1FudnNRN2ZpcnFmM0N1bGVpSjNYZmZ6MUJKSkpMWk5tRWFSN2s4V0tEdi1EVVBuUTdnZm92Sjk0MEVYZWRieTkxNWMwRzRiQmxWVHpvaGEwUnpEZGJ1UVFhQmoydGxSTW93XzFVR1ZHeG5mMTZOLWthOVVKZTZMeGdsS0dDaUROelpWc1l4QmJLNWkzRkhGUGdua3hnOHFWYUpXQWp3RktyemZiN0VBTFhfNGFZUHpNaV9jX2U0Sk9Fb2k1dXhOZHdENWpPc2dRU2ZQeHZoMnBZNEN6RHJnNU1YYk9SSzRYNzZrbXRnQ3VOdE0ydGFCM3ZBVTdHeFJLY29Feg?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data - Penn State University
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwAFBVV95cUxPZDFHdkptQ2VUM2hmWjhqQkxoRnBiTWoxMXRRR21MUG5TamdUMlFRWmhvYVNHaFVNREVKU3VmSnVOdDVZYnNLb2ppYXRVRTZmVFVMV1pLTlVhUm9ybTNZbGtvZTdIMnIyMHNpOEk5aU9TSmxxS2Y4V2MwazYwY3JlX1Axbk1nd3pfcWhFdUJaaDJWRXJaMFIyTTROcmFHeXI3ZzFudXJ2M1h6UHI1LW1Ca1dta2RkM3BiYndocGk3Yjg?oc=5" target="_blank">From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Penn State University</font>

Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process

Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!