Correcting Auto-Differentiation in Neural-ODE Training

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Does the use of auto-differentiation yield reasonable updates for deep neural networks (DNNs)? Specifically, when DNNs are designed to adhere to neural ODE architectures, can we trust the gradients provided by auto-differentiation? Through mathematical analysis and numerical evidence, we demonstrate that when neural networks employ high-order methods, such as Linear Multistep Methods (LMM) or Explicit Runge-Kutta Methods (ERK), to approximate the underlying ODE flows, brute-force auto-differentiation often introduces artificial oscillations in the gradients that prevent convergence. In the case of Leapfrog and 2-stage ERK, we propose simple post-processing techniques that effectively eliminates these oscillations, correct the gradient computation and thus returns the accurate updates.

Comments: Accepted for publication in SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. This version corresponds to the final draft, prior to copyediting and production

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)

MSC classes: 65D25 (Primary), 65L06, 90C31 (Secondary)

Cite as: arXiv:2306.02192 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2306.02192v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.02192

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yewei Xu [view email] [v1] Sat, 3 Jun 2023 20:34:14 UTC (794 KB) [v2] Wed, 3 Sep 2025 01:05:31 UTC (143 KB) [v3] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 22:56:52 UTC (186 KB)