Apple releases security fix for older iPhones and iPads to protect against DarkSword attacks
The security update protects a raft of older iPhones and iPads from attacks linked to leaked hacking tools called DarkSword.
Image Credits:Apple
12:02 PM PDT · April 1, 2026
Apple has pushed a security update to older iPhones and iPads that protects against a leaked set of powerful hacking tools capable of stealing data from a person’s device.
The tech giant said on Wednesday that it released iOS 18.7.7 and iPadOS 18.7.7 to allow a broader range of devices to “receive important security protections from web attacks called DarkSword.”
DarkSword is a hacking toolkit that can be used to break into Apple devices running iOS 18.4 through 18.7 simply by a user visiting a website that hosts the malicious code, such as legitimate websites that have themselves been breached. The exploits steal a person’s device data, including their messages, browser histories, location data, and cryptocurrency, and upload the data to a server hosted by the hackers.
The tools have already been seen in certain attacks targeting users in China, Malaysia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Ukraine. But now that the tools have been published online, security researchers warn that anyone can use these hacking tools to target people running older versions of Apple’s mobile software.
Apple says users running its latest software, iOS 26, were protected weeks ago. The company has also released a new update to iOS 18 users with iPhones and iPads that are unable to run iOS 26 software.
But with Wednesday’s update, Apple has now provided DarkSword fixes for the millions of users with unpatched devices that are capable of updating to iOS 26 but who have chosen not to update. Some users have opted not to update to avoid the software’s new “liquid glass” interface that has drawn user complaints.
Wired reported earlier on Wednesday that Apple was preparing to release the update.
Apple customers who have switched on automatic software updates should receive the new software. Apple said its optional security protections feature, Lockdown Mode, also defends against DarkSword attacks. The company told TechCrunch last week that it is unaware of any successful government spyware attack against an Apple device running Lockdown Mode.
Topics
Zack Whittaker is the security editor at TechCrunch. He also authors the weekly cybersecurity newsletter, this week in security.
He can be reached via encrypted message at zackwhittaker.1337 on Signal. You can also contact him by email, or to verify outreach, at [email protected].
View Bio
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
releaseupdate
Listen to Gryffindor
Lesson: The enemy is compliance, and the solution is courage. (This post uses the Hogwarts houses as an evocative lens. See the footnote [1] if you are unfamiliar.) Behaviour: You're making a career choice. Your local EA community needs a director. You're unsure but commit, since it's important work. You don't get funded, work for less than your happy price, and start running on fumes. You're trying to think how to get something real done, again. You think of HJPEV. You realize you need to be more diligent, lock in and apply conscientiousness, and solve the problem. You spend years trying to simulate conscientiousness, and pay the rent to unworkable TODO systems, overburdened calendars, and feeling trapped in systems devised by you. You buy a robot vacuum. You tell your SO how it cost 1/40
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases
Obsolescence without hostility: optimization, uniformity, and the erosion of human meaning in a post-AI world
Most contemporary discussions of artificial intelligence focus on misalignment, loss of control, or catastrophic harm. This paper examines a different and comparatively neglected possibility: that advanced AI may erode the social conditions under which human meaning has historically been generated, without conflict, coercion, or displacement. The central question is not whether AI dominates humanity, but whether human participation remains causally significant once AI systems outperform humans across core instrumental domains. The argument is conditional and long-horizon in scope. It proceeds from the observation that existing limits on AI superiority are primarily technological and economic rather than principled. If these constraints are progressively overcome, and AI systems come to out
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!