Apple releases iOS 26.5 beta without any sign of AI Siri - Mashable SEA
Apple releases iOS 26.5 beta without any sign of AI Siri Mashable SEA
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on GNews AI Apple →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
release
Microsoft just shipped the clearest signal yet that it is building an AI empire without OpenAI
Six months after renegotiating the contract that once barred it from independently pursuing frontier AI, Microsoft has released three in-house models that directly challenge the partner it spent $13 billion cultivating. MAI-Transcribe-1, MAI-Voice-1, and MAI-Image-2 are now available in Microsoft Foundry, and they do not carry OpenAI’s name anywhere on the label. The models are [ ] This story continues at The Next Web
The Hidden Cost of Manual Intervention in Digital Products
There is a cost your product team is almost certainly not tracking. It does not appear on your engineering budget. It does not show up in your infrastructure bills. It does not get flagged in your sprint retrospectives. And yet it compounds quietly across every release, every scaling event, and every new hire — until it becomes the single most significant drag on your platform’s ability to grow. The cost is manual intervention. Every time a team member has to step in to make a decision the system should have made, you are paying this cost. Every escalation, every workaround, every “just ask Sarah about that” is a withdrawal from an account most teams have never even opened. This article is about why that cost is so hard to see, how it compounds, and what it actually means to design it out
Gemma 4 Architecture Comparison
Flagship open-weight release days are always exciting. Was just reading through the Gemma 4 reports, configs, and code, and here are my takeaways: Architecture-wise, besides multi-model support, Gemma 4 (31B) looks pretty much unchanged compared to Gemma 3 (27B). Link to the comparison page: https://sebastianraschka.com/llm-architecture-gallery/?compare=gemma-3-27b 2Cgemma-4-31b Gemma 4 maintains a relatively unique Pre- and Post-norm setup and remains relatively classic, with a 5:1 hybrid attention mechanism combining a sliding-window (local) layer and a full-attention (global) layer. https://preview.redd.it/7bn493789zsg1.png?width=1444 format=png auto=webp s=4b28421ed276cb0b1ba133e3c325d446d68ea1ef The attention mechanism itself is also classic Grouped Query Attention (GQA). But let’s no
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases
Microsoft just shipped the clearest signal yet that it is building an AI empire without OpenAI
Six months after renegotiating the contract that once barred it from independently pursuing frontier AI, Microsoft has released three in-house models that directly challenge the partner it spent $13 billion cultivating. MAI-Transcribe-1, MAI-Voice-1, and MAI-Image-2 are now available in Microsoft Foundry, and they do not carry OpenAI’s name anywhere on the label. The models are [ ] This story continues at The Next Web
The Axios supply chain attack used individually targeted social engineering
The Axios team have published a full postmortem on the supply chain attack which resulted in a malware dependency going out in a release the other day , and it involved a sophisticated social engineering campaign targeting one of their maintainers directly. Here's Jason Saayman'a description of how that worked : so the attack vector mimics what google has documented here: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/unc1069-targets-cryptocurrency-ai-social-engineering they tailored this process specifically to me by doing the following: they reached out masquerading as the founder of a company they had cloned the companys founders likeness as well as the company itself. they then invited me to a real slack workspace. this workspace was branded to the companies ci and named in a
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!