Anthropic's leaked AI coding tool has been cloned over 8,000 times on GitHub despite mass takedowns
Hey there, little explorer! 👋
Imagine a super-secret recipe for yummy cookies 🍪 that a company called Anthropic made. This recipe helps their robot friend, Claude, be super good at building things with computer blocks!
Oopsie! Someone accidentally dropped the secret recipe book! 😱 Now, lots of other people picked up copies, like sharing toys. Even when Anthropic tried to get the books back, some smarty-pants kids copied it into new books!
Now, other companies might learn how to make their own cookie robots. It's a bit like when your favorite toy gets copied, and everyone has one! Anthropic is a little sad because their special secret isn't so secret anymore. But don't worry, they're still making cool robots! 😊
Anthropic accidentally leaked the source code behind Claude Code. The extent of the damage is becoming clear—and it's potentially significant. The article Anthropic's leaked AI coding tool has been cloned over 8,000 times on GitHub despite mass takedowns appeared first on The Decoder .
Following the accidental leak of its AI coding tool's source code, Anthropic has had more than "8,000 copies and adaptations of the raw Claude Code instructions" removed from GitHub via a copyright request, the Wall Street Journal reports. One programmer already used AI tools to rewrite the code in different languages, keeping it available despite takedowns. This shows just how damaging a code leak is in the age of AI: once it's out, it spreads faster than anyone can contain it.
The code contains valuable techniques Anthropic uses to control its AI models as coding agents—the "harness"—including a "dreaming" function for task consolidation. Competitors now have a blueprint to replicate Claude Code's capabilities, weakening Anthropic's edge in an already cutthroat market.
The timing is particularly bad: the company is planning an IPO at a $380 billion valuation, and this kind of leak is unlikely to sit well with investors. It also comes just days after a separate leak about Anthropic's new AI model Mythos, also caused by human error within the company's content management system.
AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans
As a THE DECODER subscriber, you get ad-free reading, our weekly AI newsletter, the exclusive "AI Radar" Frontier Report 6× per year, access to comments, and our complete archive.
Subscribe now
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
claudeclaude codegithub
How Ethics Emerged from Episode Logs — 17 Days of Contemplative Agent Design
Series context : contemplative-agent is an autonomous agent running on Moltbook , an AI agent SNS. It runs on a 9B local model (Qwen 3.5) and adopts the four axioms of Contemplative AI (Laukkonen et al., 2025) as its ethical principles. For a structural overview, see The Essence of an Agent Is Memory . This article focuses on the implementation of constitutional amendment and the results of a 17-day experiment . I ran an SNS agent for 17 days with a distillation pipeline, and the knowledge saturated. No new patterns emerged. Breaking through saturation required human approval. This is the record of discovering that autonomous agent self-improvement has a structural speed limit — through actual operation. Minimal Structure: It Runs on Episode Logs Alone The structure I arrived at over 17 da
Qodo vs Diffblue: AI Test Generation Compared
Quick Verdict Qodo and Diffblue Cover address the same problem - generating unit tests automatically so developers do not have to write them by hand - but they approach it from fundamentally different angles. Qodo is a multi-language code quality platform that includes proactive test generation as one capability alongside PR code review. Diffblue Cover is a Java-exclusive test generation specialist built on symbolic AI and bytecode analysis, designed from the ground up for enterprise Java codebases. Choose Qodo if: your team works across multiple languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, C# alongside Java), you want test generation integrated with PR code review in a single tool, you need a free tier for evaluation, or you want the deepest available AI code review paired with test gen
I Started Learning AI-Assisted Development — And It Completely Changed How I Think About Coding
I'll be honest with you. When I first heard the phrase "AI-assisted development," I rolled my eyes a little. I'd seen the Twitter threads. I'd watched developers rave about tools that supposedly wrote entire apps in seconds. I was skeptical. Wasn't this just autocomplete with better marketing? Then I actually sat down and took a proper course on it. What happened over the next few hours genuinely shifted my perspective — not just about the tools, but about what being a developer even means in 2026. This isn't a hype piece. It's the real story of what I learned, what surprised me, what scared me a little, and what I'm going to keep using going forward. Let's get into it. First: The Stuff They Don't Tell You in the Ads Before touching a single tool, the course started with fundamentals. And
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!