Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessPost Quantum Cryptography - ComputerphileComputerphile YTScientists Build Living Robots With Nervous SystemsIEEE RoboticsWhy AI health chatbots won’t make you better at diagnosing yourself – new research - Gavi, the Vaccine AllianceGoogle News: AIRun OpenCode in Docker - Clean machine, same convenienceDEV CommunityGood UI Is Just Invisible EngineeringDEV CommunityFace Tracking for Vertical Video: Why It's Harder Than It Looks (And How It Works)DEV CommunityI Built a Privacy-First Developer Toolbox That Runs 100% in Your BrowserDEV CommunityI Published 3 Products on Gumroad. 0 Sales. Here's My Honest Postmortem.DEV CommunityPersist session state with filesystem configuration and execute shell commandsAWS AI BlogExclusive: Beehiiv expands into podcasting, taking aim at PatreonTechCrunch AICommon Manual Testing Techniques and The Future of Manual Testing in the age of AIDEV CommunityBlue Owl caps private credit funds redemptions at 5% after steep request levelsCNBC TechnologyBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessPost Quantum Cryptography - ComputerphileComputerphile YTScientists Build Living Robots With Nervous SystemsIEEE RoboticsWhy AI health chatbots won’t make you better at diagnosing yourself – new research - Gavi, the Vaccine AllianceGoogle News: AIRun OpenCode in Docker - Clean machine, same convenienceDEV CommunityGood UI Is Just Invisible EngineeringDEV CommunityFace Tracking for Vertical Video: Why It's Harder Than It Looks (And How It Works)DEV CommunityI Built a Privacy-First Developer Toolbox That Runs 100% in Your BrowserDEV CommunityI Published 3 Products on Gumroad. 0 Sales. Here's My Honest Postmortem.DEV CommunityPersist session state with filesystem configuration and execute shell commandsAWS AI BlogExclusive: Beehiiv expands into podcasting, taking aim at PatreonTechCrunch AICommon Manual Testing Techniques and The Future of Manual Testing in the age of AIDEV CommunityBlue Owl caps private credit funds redemptions at 5% after steep request levelsCNBC Technology
AI NEWS HUBbyEIGENVECTOREigenvector

AI tools are great for individuals. but what about your team?

DEV Communityby Jinhwan KimApril 1, 20262 min read2 views
Source Quiz

<p>Everyone on your team is using AI. Cursor, Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT. Individually, they work really well.</p> <p>But here's the thing. Every AI session is a solo conversation. Your teammate asked Claude about the error handling. You asked GPT to scaffold the API. PM used ChatGPT for the requirements. Three separate contexts. Nobody sees each other's work.</p> <p>PR review comes. It doesn't match what was discussed. "Wait, when did we decide that?" Rework starts.</p> <p>The problem isn't AI itself. It's that there's no team layer on top of it.</p> <h2> Why I started building this </h2> <p>I'm a product designer, been working in enterprise for over 10 years at places like Morningstar and JLL. I saw this pattern way before AI tools existed. Decisions live in Slack threads, Notion docs, som

Everyone on your team is using AI. Cursor, Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT. Individually, they work really well.

But here's the thing. Every AI session is a solo conversation. Your teammate asked Claude about the error handling. You asked GPT to scaffold the API. PM used ChatGPT for the requirements. Three separate contexts. Nobody sees each other's work.

PR review comes. It doesn't match what was discussed. "Wait, when did we decide that?" Rework starts.

The problem isn't AI itself. It's that there's no team layer on top of it.

Why I started building this

I'm a product designer, been working in enterprise for over 10 years at places like Morningstar and JLL. I saw this pattern way before AI tools existed. Decisions live in Slack threads, Notion docs, someone's head. AI just made the gap worse because now everyone moves faster, but in different directions.

I wanted to fix what happens between "we agreed on this" and "the code actually ships."

What Scindo does

It's a workspace where your team discusses, plans, and ships with AI agents in the same thread.

  • Chat → Agent and team discuss together. Edge cases come up in the conversation, not in PR comments later.

  • Plan → Agent drafts a plan from what was discussed. Team reviews it.

  • Build → Developer opens their editor with the plan loaded.

  • Ship → Agent opens the PR. Reviewer sees the plan and the code diff together.

There are different agent roles, Engineer, QA, Security, Designer, Product. Connects to GitHub, Jira, Notion, Linear, Figma. Works in VS Code and CLI too.

Pricing is per-workspace, not per-seat. Because the whole point is getting the whole team in.

Where we are

Three weeks since launch. Small group of early users. Free tier is 50 AI responses/month, 1 workspace, up to 3 members. Enough to try it on a real feature.

Curious how other small teams handle this. How do you go from "we agreed on this" to "the code matches what we agreed on"?

scindo.one

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by Eigenvector · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
AI tools ar…claudelaunchproductfeaturecopilotreviewDEV Communi…

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 183 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Products