AI-adoption starts with leadership: five strategic insights - EY
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMimwFBVV95cUxOTHd2ZWFoczNGcDRqX2lNYU9jSDBDcnZOYlNXN0w1b2NQUzFvV0FlaXZpS3dKenhCaXBrdGNza21uSXlPczRfNy1jMW1EaU5YSDZaMk9hLWpDSE5aMXZmZ3hrZ1hrNHBfQXVlNUUwenl0MTJoOXVHM2RWeXdLQkFaeEVnRFR1RzRjRTFWRzdlcXlteHNtMTJkOTY0aw?oc=5" target="_blank">AI-adoption starts with leadership: five strategic insights</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">EY</font>
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on GNews AI Netherlands →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
insight
On the Role of Reasoning Patterns in the Generalization Discrepancy of Long Chain-of-Thought Supervised Fine-Tuning
arXiv:2604.01702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories has become a pivotal phase in building large reasoning models. However, how CoT trajectories from different sources influence the generalization performance of models remains an open question. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study using two sources of verified CoT trajectories generated by two competing models, \texttt{DeepSeek-R1-0528} and \texttt{gpt-oss-120b}, with their problem sets controlled to be identical. Despite their comparable performance, we uncover a striking paradox: lower training loss does not translate to better generalization. SFT on \texttt{DeepSeek-R1-0528} data achieves remarkably lower training loss, yet exhibits significantly worse general
Wired for Overconfidence: A Mechanistic Perspective on Inflated Verbalized Confidence in LLMs
arXiv:2604.01457v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are often not just wrong, but \emph{confidently wrong}: when they produce factually incorrect answers, they tend to verbalize overly high confidence rather than signal uncertainty. Such verbalized overconfidence can mislead users and weaken confidence scores as a reliable uncertainty signal, yet its internal mechanisms remain poorly understood. We present a circuit-level mechanistic analysis of this inflated verbalized confidence in LLMs, organized around three axes: capturing verbalized confidence as a differentiable internal signal, identifying the circuits that causally inflate it, and leveraging these insights for targeted inference-time recalibration. Across two instruction-tuned LLMs on three datasets, we find that
Spread vs Rest Operators in JavaScript
If you’ve ever seen ... in JavaScript and wondered what it does—you’re not alone. The same syntax is used for two different purposes : Spread operator → expands values Rest operator → collects values Understanding this difference is crucial for writing clean and modern JavaScript. 🧠 What Is the Spread Operator? The spread operator ( ... ) is used to expand elements from arrays or objects. Think: “Open the box and take everything out” 📦 Spread with Arrays ```js id="spread1" const arr1 = [1, 2, 3]; const arr2 = [...arr1, 4, 5]; console.log(arr2); // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 👉 It spreads elements individually. --- ### 📊 Visualization ```id="viz1" [1, 2, 3] ↓ ...arr ↓ 1, 2, 3 📦 Copying Arrays ```js id="spread2" const original = [1, 2, 3]; const copy = [...original]; ✔ Creates a shallow copy ✔ Avoi
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!