Live
Black Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Business1 dead in Peru football stadium tragedy, dozens injuredSCMP Tech (Asia AI)🔥 ml-explore/mlx-lmGitHub Trending🔥 imbue-ai/mngrGitHub Trending🔥 HKUDS/LightRAGGitHub Trending🔥 block/gooseGitHub Trending10 Best Tools to Get Cited by ChatGPT in 2026 - MEXC ExchangeGoogle News: ChatGPTHow to Automate Your Daily Workflow with ChatGPT and ZapierDev.to AII've Interviewed 50 AI-Native Junior Devs This Year. Here's the Brutal Truth.Dev.to AI$47M Deepfake Fraud Ring Exposes a Blind Spot in Evidence WorkflowsDev.to AIWe tested structured ontology vs Markdown+RAG for AI agents — "why?" recall was 0% vs 100%Dev.to AICodex now offers more flexible pricing for teamsDev.to AIRoborock Saros 20 vs Saros 10R: 36,000 Pa suction dominates but Sonic version loomsDev.to AIBlack Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Business1 dead in Peru football stadium tragedy, dozens injuredSCMP Tech (Asia AI)🔥 ml-explore/mlx-lmGitHub Trending🔥 imbue-ai/mngrGitHub Trending🔥 HKUDS/LightRAGGitHub Trending🔥 block/gooseGitHub Trending10 Best Tools to Get Cited by ChatGPT in 2026 - MEXC ExchangeGoogle News: ChatGPTHow to Automate Your Daily Workflow with ChatGPT and ZapierDev.to AII've Interviewed 50 AI-Native Junior Devs This Year. Here's the Brutal Truth.Dev.to AI$47M Deepfake Fraud Ring Exposes a Blind Spot in Evidence WorkflowsDev.to AIWe tested structured ontology vs Markdown+RAG for AI agents — "why?" recall was 0% vs 100%Dev.to AICodex now offers more flexible pricing for teamsDev.to AIRoborock Saros 20 vs Saros 10R: 36,000 Pa suction dominates but Sonic version loomsDev.to AI
AI NEWS HUBbyEIGENVECTOREigenvector

Adaptive Fully Dynamic $k$-Center Clustering with (Near-)Optimal Worst-Case Guarantees

arXiv cs.DSby [Submitted on 2 Apr 2026]April 3, 20262 min read1 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2604.01726v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Given a sequence of adversarial point insertions and point deletions, is it possible to simultaneously optimize the approximation ratio, update time, and recourse for a $k$-clustering problem? If so, can this be achieved with worst-case guarantees against an adaptive adversary? These questions have garnered significant attention in recent years. Prior works by Bhattacharya, Costa, Garg, Lattanzi, and Parotsidis [FOCS '24] and by Bhattacharya, Costa, and Farokhnejad [STOC '25] have taken significant steps toward this direction for the $k$-median clustering problem and its generalization, the $(k, z)$-clustering problem. In this paper, we study the $k$-center clustering problem, which is one of the most classical and well-studied $k$-clustering

View PDF

Abstract:Given a sequence of adversarial point insertions and point deletions, is it possible to simultaneously optimize the approximation ratio, update time, and recourse for a $k$-clustering problem? If so, can this be achieved with worst-case guarantees against an adaptive adversary? These questions have garnered significant attention in recent years. Prior works by Bhattacharya, Costa, Garg, Lattanzi, and Parotsidis [FOCS '24] and by Bhattacharya, Costa, and Farokhnejad [STOC '25] have taken significant steps toward this direction for the $k$-median clustering problem and its generalization, the $(k, z)$-clustering problem. In this paper, we study the $k$-center clustering problem, which is one of the most classical and well-studied $k$-clustering problems. Recently, Bhattacharya, Costa, Farokhnejad, Lattanzi, and Parotsidis [ICML '25] provided an affirmative answer to the first question for the $k$-center clustering problem. However, their work did not resolve the second question, as their result provides only expected amortized guarantees against an oblivious adversary. In this work, we make significant progress and close the gap by answering both questions in the affirmative. Specifically, we show that the fully dynamic $k$-center clustering problem admits a constant-factor approximation, near-optimal worst-case update time, and constant worst-case recourse, even against an adaptive adversary. This is achieved by first developing a fully dynamic bicriteria approximation algorithm with (near-)optimal worst-case bounds, and then designing a suitable fully dynamic $k$-center algorithm with near-linear update time. For the fully dynamic bicriteria approximation algorithm, we establish the worst-case recourse and worst-case update time guarantees separately, and then merge them into a single algorithm through a simple yet elegant process.

Subjects:

Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)

Cite as: arXiv:2604.01726 [cs.DS]

(or arXiv:2604.01726v1 [cs.DS] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01726

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Antonis Skarlatos [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Apr 2026 07:45:33 UTC (388 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by Eigenvector · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

announceupdatestudy

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Adaptive Fu…announceupdatestudypaperarxivarXiv cs.DS

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 208 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!