A Russian governor is ordering companies to choose at least 2 employees as 'candidates' to sign up with the military
The order, signed by Ryazan's governor, instructs companies to select two to five workers who might be candidates for contract military service.
A Russian military serviceman speaks with an attendee at a military festival.
Contributor/Getty Images
2026-04-01T05:16:31.683Z
-
The governor of Ryazan, a Russian region, is telling businesses to help with military recruitment.
-
He's instructed local firms with at least 150 workers to submit employee names for contract service.
-
Contract soldiers make up the bulk of Russia's recruitment for the war in Ukraine.
A Russian governor has ordered large firms in his region to shortlist employees as "candidates" for military service, in a rare push for businesses to get involved with recruitment.
The order — signed by Pavel Malkov, the governor of Ryazan, a region 130 miles southeast of Moscow — instructed companies with 150 or more workers to select their employees by September 20.
These employees would be candidates for "military service under contract" with the Russian military, the notice said. In Russia, contract military service contributes to the bulk of recruitment for the Ukraine war and is meant to be voluntary.
The new legislation, dated March 20, was reported this week by Russian independent media and open-source intelligence groups.
The order is addressed to all business entities "regardless of their form of ownership," indicating that private and state-owned organizations are subject to the requirements.
According to Malkov's order, businesses and institutions with 150 to 300 workers must submit two candidate employees, while those with 300 to 500 workers must designate three. Firms and entities with 500 or more workers must submit five names.
Malkov's order did not specify penalties for failing to submit the quotas on time. His directive cited two decrees signed in 2022 by Russian President Vladimir Putin putting the country under heightened readiness amid the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Ryazan local law says businesses that obstruct those decrees could be fined up to 1 million rubles, or about $12,300.
The candidacy mandate comes as Russia has been aggressively pushing new ways to find fresh troops while taking heavy losses in Ukraine, offering large sign-up bonuses to its citizens and increasingly leaning on informal or covert overseas recruitment networks.
Moscow said that over 420,000 people signed up for military contracts last year. But the recruitment rate has been repeatedly reported to be dwindling in larger cities, where residents are now more wary of joining the brutal conflict.
The heavy military focus is likely to come at a high cost to Russia's already struggling economy. The country is facing labor shortages, for example, that its officials have warned could reach 11 million workers by 2030.
Russia hopes to eventually grow its active-duty force to 1.5 million soldiers, with a total force of 2.38 million when including support and civilian service personnel. In 2025, it spent about 6.3% of its GDP on defense.
Business Insider
https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-governor-ryazan-employee-businessses-candidates-join-military-recruitment-2026-4Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
servicerussiaWhy LLM orchestration is broken (and how cryptographic agent identities fix it)
<p>Last week, a “helpful” coding agent opened a PR, commented on the issue, triggered CI, and then tried to deploy to staging.</p> <p>The weird part? Nobody could answer a basic question:</p> <p><strong>What rights did that agent actually have, and who gave them?</strong></p> <p>Not “which API key did it use.”<br> Not “which workflow ran.”<br> Not even “which model generated the output.”</p> <p>I mean: <strong>which agent</strong> took the action, <strong>what it was allowed to do</strong>, and <strong>whether that authority was delegated intentionally</strong>.</p> <p>That’s the orchestration rights problem, and it’s getting worse as teams wire up Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Devin, internal bots, MCP servers, GitHub Actions, and homegrown tools into one giant autonomous spaghetti pile.</p> <
Why Cybersecurity Compliance Is Now a Strategic Business Asset — Not Just a Legal Obligation
<p>Ask most business leaders what cybersecurity compliance means to their organization and the answer will center on obligation: avoiding regulatory fines, passing audits, satisfying contractual requirements from enterprise customers. These are real and valid reasons to maintain compliance — but they capture only a fraction of the business value that a mature compliance program actually delivers.<br> The organizations that treat compliance purely as a legal necessity are leaving significant strategic value on the table. The ones that treat it as a business asset are doing something fundamentally different — and reaping correspondingly different rewards.<br> The Compliance Landscape Has Changed<br> Regulatory requirements around data security have expanded dramatically over the last decade,
Bureau Veritas Launches an Independent AI Assessment Offering for European Enterprises, Developed in Partnership with Amazon Web Services (AWS) - 01net
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi9AFBVV95cUxPazJTNEF2LTR1dy1wZlBiMTE3Q0xKMWVucF9XYVFKN3BxczNpaXdBYlZCNGdyOGhvaVBxSTdmNHBSTmllYkNCMWtFdGVScHpxS0ZFcG5BTFotSUNOQzF2eTdiU2lodGl5X0t1a1BKaTdpVTN1RG1UYU03ZkhwMUdBZmRobFBvaFBaN2lQQ0J3UGcwRlVVaUVaWnRHZ3dIMURYQktzMkVsZm8zdEI2V1FzZUJmOEsybE8wVFEwTXRxbHhlQXNaMHBVUU5WbXc5TTRCSkdNSnFKRlUwQ1I3NDk4blZUNVhiQWZiQndYY3BGbGh6S1hW?oc=5" target="_blank">Bureau Veritas Launches an Independent AI Assessment Offering for European Enterprises, Developed in Partnership with Amazon Web Services (AWS)</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">01net</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
Ambience Healthcare Showcases AI Nursing Tool Pilots With Major Health Systems - TipRanks
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMixAFBVV95cUxQYUc1QUMxZHVDTExQUi04bkhqNTEtNVJKMUl2ZnpuRHZ5RFV5Z1RyZzdOQnd6cERMa1Y2c0w2S3RtY1BBUk9lckVGTE9vZzl2alF3NURmSlN4eWlMUko0cnNaa09uQmZVMU1ZY2pLOUhzRkJGSXFaTnVNRG5tdkx6U0VpX3M2QW5MYUNJem5OR0lMRTRBeUVVT2cxbWwxb2QtRFVCVW1hNjA0dkp1TGJyT0VOTGxBMjNBUXM4RGpobHNMV2Fa?oc=5" target="_blank">Ambience Healthcare Showcases AI Nursing Tool Pilots With Major Health Systems</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">TipRanks</font>
New AI tool detects hidden cancer mutations - UC Santa Cruz - News
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMif0FVX3lxTFA2RGdBcTNaMjVCZnRnemhfQXU5SHVQelpXbXhKcW9TSmN3NjktMnJLTS1tSEJTaWFiRVg5aXJLZFpqY3RiWEpaVjY5aHczMW9yTG5sZTdZNFcycnZIOEpyR3lqMHBnOG12b3Vfb0tZdG9ieVpsWmxZOWs0N2Jocm8?oc=5" target="_blank">New AI tool detects hidden cancer mutations</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">UC Santa Cruz - News</font>
Beyond the Hype: A Practical Guide to Integrating AI into Your Development Workflow
<h2> The AI Tidal Wave: Are You Building Boats or Waiting for the Tsunami? </h2> <p>Another week, another flood of "Will AI Replace Developers?" articles. While that existential debate rages, a quiet revolution is already underway in the trenches. The real question isn't about replacement; it's about <strong>augmentation</strong>. How can you, as a developer, harness AI tools today to write better code, solve complex problems faster, and free up your mental bandwidth for truly creative engineering?</p> <p>This guide moves past the hype. We'll explore practical, actionable strategies for integrating AI into your daily development workflow, complete with code examples and real-world use cases. Let's stop speculating about the future and start building it.</p> <h2> The AI Toolbox: More Than J
Why LLM orchestration is broken (and how cryptographic agent identities fix it)
<p>Last week, a “helpful” coding agent opened a PR, commented on the issue, triggered CI, and then tried to deploy to staging.</p> <p>The weird part? Nobody could answer a basic question:</p> <p><strong>What rights did that agent actually have, and who gave them?</strong></p> <p>Not “which API key did it use.”<br> Not “which workflow ran.”<br> Not even “which model generated the output.”</p> <p>I mean: <strong>which agent</strong> took the action, <strong>what it was allowed to do</strong>, and <strong>whether that authority was delegated intentionally</strong>.</p> <p>That’s the orchestration rights problem, and it’s getting worse as teams wire up Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Devin, internal bots, MCP servers, GitHub Actions, and homegrown tools into one giant autonomous spaghetti pile.</p> <
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!