☺️ Trust Us With Your Face | EFFector 38.4
<div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden"><div class="field__items"><div class="field__item even"><p>Do you remember the last time you were carded at a bar or restaurant? It was probably such a quick and normal experience, that you barely remember it. But have you ever been carded to use the internet? Being required to present your ID to access content online is becoming a growing reality for many. We're explaining the dangers of age verification laws, and the latest in the fight for privacy and free speech online, with our <a href="https://eff.org/effector/38/4">EFFector newsletter</a>.</p> <p>For over 35 years, <a href="https://eff.org/effector">EFFector</a> has been your guide to understanding the intersection of technology, civil liberti
Do you remember the last time you were carded at a bar or restaurant? It was probably such a quick and normal experience, that you barely remember it. But have you ever been carded to use the internet? Being required to present your ID to access content online is becoming a growing reality for many. We're explaining the dangers of age verification laws, and the latest in the fight for privacy and free speech online, with our EFFector newsletter.
For over 35 years, EFFector has been your guide to understanding the intersection of technology, civil liberties, and the law. This issue covers Discord's controversial rollout of mandatory age verification, a leaked Meta memo on face-scanning smart glasses, and a Super Bowl surveillance ad that said the quiet part out loud.
Prefer to listen in? In our audio companion, EFF Associate Director of State Affairs Rin Alajaji explains how online age verification hurts free expression for all users. Find the conversation on YouTube or the Internet Archive.
LISTEN TO EFFECTOR
EFFECTOR 38.4 - ☺️ Trust Us With Your Face
Want to stay in the fight for privacy and free speech online? Sign up for EFF's EFFector newsletter for updates, ways to take action, and new merch drops. You can also fuel the fight against mandatory age verification laws when you support EFF today!
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/02/trust-us-your-face-effector-384Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
updatebillion
Resolve.ai Alternative: Open Source AI for Incident Investigation
Key Takeaway: Resolve.ai is a $1B-valued AI SRE platform used by Coinbase, DoorDash, and Salesforce — but pricing requires contacting sales with no public pricing page. Aurora is an open source (Apache 2.0) alternative that delivers autonomous AI investigation with sandboxed cloud execution, infrastructure graphs, and knowledge base search — completely free and self-hosted. What is Resolve.ai? Resolve.ai is an AI-powered autonomous SRE platform founded in 2024 by Spiros Xanthos (former SVP at Splunk, co-creator of OpenTelemetry ) and Mayank Agarwal. It raised $125M in Series A at a reported $1 billion valuation , backed by Lightspeed and Greylock with angels including Fei-Fei Li and Jeff Dean. Resolve.ai positions as "machines on call for humans" — a multi-agent AI system that autonomously

I built a Python pipeline that auto-generates digital products using Claude API — here's the architecture
I built a machine that makes digital products. It runs 24/7 on a $600 Mac mini in my home office. Here's the honest story: 119 pipeline runs, 57 products shipped, $0 in revenue so far — and why I'm publishing this anyway. The concept The idea is embarrassingly simple: scan the internet for pain points → rank which ones make viable products → auto-generate the product with Claude → publish it to a static site and Gumroad → repeat weekly. No human writes the content. No human formats the pages. I only touch two things: approving or rejecting ideas (via Telegram inline buttons on my phone) and occasionally debugging Python. The pipeline trend_scan.py → scrapes Reddit for questions and complaints → synthesizes pain points into product ideas idea_rank.py → scores each idea: audience size, searc

Migrating a Webpack-Era Federated Module to Vite Without Breaking the Host Contract
A practical guide to migrating a federated remote to Vite, based on lessons from a real migration. I was tasked with updating a legacy React application that did not support Module Federation. That integration was added first so the app could run as a remote inside a larger host application. Later, the remote needed to migrate from Create React App (CRA) to Vite. By that point, the host already depended on the remote's loading behavior. The tricky part was not replacing CRA with Vite. It was preserving the runtime contract while only the remote changed bundlers. If you own a CRA or webpack-era remote that still has to load cleanly inside an existing host, this post covers the cleanup work beforehand, the core CRA-to-Vite swap, the federation-specific deployment fixes, and a local dev harne
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Laws & Regulation

A Baseless Copyright Claim Against a Web Host—and Why It Failed
Copyright law is supposed to encourage creativity. Too often, it’s used to extract payouts from others. Higbee Associates, a law firm known for sending copyright demand letters to website owners, targeted May First Movement Technology, accusing it of infringing a photograph owned by Agence France-Presse (AFP). The claim was baseless. May First didn’t post the photo. It didn’t even own the website where the photo appeared. May First is a nonprofit membership organization that provides web hosting and technical infrastructure to social justice groups around the world. The allegedly infringing image was posted years ago by one of May First’s members, a human rights group based in Mexico. When May First learned about the copyright complaint, it ensured that the group removed the image. That sh

Some things I noticed while LARPing as a grantmaker
Written to a new grantmaker. The first three points are the most important. Focus on opportunities many times your bar. Most value comes from finding/creating projects many times your bar, rather than discriminating between opportunities around your bar. If you find/create a new opportunity to donate $1M at 10x your bar (and cause it to get $1M, which would otherwise be donated to a 1x thing), you generate $9M of value (at your bar). [1] If you cause a $1M at 1.5x opportunity to get funded or a $1M at 0.5x opportunity to not get funded, you generate $500K of value. The former is 18 times as good. You should probably be like I do research to figure out what projects should exist, then make them exist rather than I evaluate the applications that come to me . That said, most great ideas come


Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!